Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a general score of 81.5, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. The Galaxy S23 Ultra is a way lighter but somewhat thicker phone than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater screen density. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a much better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.