Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s general score of 79.3. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is a lot newer than Galaxy S6 edge+, it's just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features a greater performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a little inferior pixels count in each inch in the screen and a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px. LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a camera that's just as good as LG V35 ThinQ's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.