Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-10-17 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ3's 79.6 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ is a notably thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Sony Xperia XZ3, even when both were released with only a couple of months difference. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xperia XZ3 counts with a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ. They have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2880px, the same quantity of pixels per display inch and a same size screen. LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Sony Xperia XZ3 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xperia XZ3 features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one, although the Xperia XZ3 also has 3330mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.