Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is older and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still a lot lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a really bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera, a way larger sensor and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 73% bigger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.