Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 84.5 score against 81.2. IPhone XS Max's construction has the same thickness than the LG V40 ThinQ, but it is heavier. IPhone XS Max features a slightly better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
IPhone XS Max has a little faster processor than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has less and slower processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4% greater battery capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same video definition and a same resolution camera, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.