Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, having a general score of 81.6 against 81.2. The Google Pixel 2 is an older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ, but Google made it somewhat lighter anyway. The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bigger display.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower video definition and a worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same sensor size, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.