Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. Although the Google Pixel XL is older and thicker than LG V40 ThinQ, it's body is still just a little bit lighter. LG V40 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because it has a slightly higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a larger display and a just a little higher display pixels density.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels, a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
Google Pixel XL counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.