Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, with a global score of 83.7 against 81.2. Both devices in this review use the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Despite being the best we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little heavier and a bit thicker phone than the LG V40 ThinQ.
LG V50 ThinQ features a display that's very similar to the LG V40 ThinQ one, both have a screen of the same size, the same screen density and the same exact 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The LG V40 ThinQ and the LG V50 ThinQ feature incredibly similar processing units, both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. LG V50 ThinQ has better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ's camera is just as good as LG V40 ThinQ's camera, both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate, a 0.38 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same video resolution and a 12 mega pixels back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs more money than LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.