Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a general score of 81.2 against 77.9. These phones use Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The LG V40 ThinQ is a much newer device, and it's also a little lighter and way thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better display density.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower video resolution and a back camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has improved battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Although LG V40 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.