Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, having an 81.2 score against 81.2. The LG V40 ThinQ is an much older cellphone than Motorola Edge 50, but it's just a little lighter and a little thinner anyway. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit better display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712, it also counts with a quite larger display.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 features a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way bigger sensor and a back facing camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 features a superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.