Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is older than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, it's design is thinner and lighter.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G Stylus, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Stylus has better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Moto G Stylus takes better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more MP back-facing camera.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.