Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a score of 84.7 against 81.2. The Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and LG V40 ThinQ counts with Android 10 operating system. Although Galaxy A32 is extremely newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it is thicker and heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a way better resolution camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.