Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with an 81.2 score against 81. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. LG V40 ThinQ's body is newer and somewhat lighter, but a bit thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little larger display and more pixels per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.