Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, with a global score of 81.2 against 76.1. LG V40 ThinQ's body is newer, a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a little bigger screen and a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
Galaxy J7 Max's battery life is very similar to the LG V40 ThinQ one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.