Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. LG V40 ThinQ is a incredibly older and much thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but LG was able to build it extremely lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better looking display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 73 percent greater battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.