Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is better than the LG V50 ThinQ, with a general score of 93.3 against 83.7. IPhone 13 Pro's body is much newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the LG V50 ThinQ. IPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while LG V50 ThinQ counts with Android 10 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit lower display density, a bit worse resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a little bit smaller screen. IPhone 13 Pro features a superior performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro. Both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with improved battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.