Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than the LG V50 ThinQ, getting a global score of 93.2 against 83.7. IPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and LG V50 ThinQ works with Android 10 OS. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro Max is noticeably heavier than the LG V50 ThinQ, it's a little bit thinner and much newer.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a quite superior hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor. LG V50 ThinQ and iPhone 13 Pro Max both feature quite similar displays, because although the iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little lower display density and a quite lower 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max. Both of them have the same 60 fps video frame rate, a same resolution camera in the back, the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture. LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V50 ThinQ, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.