Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. Even though the iPhone X is older than LG V50 ThinQ, it's body is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner. The iPhone X features a little bit better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone X features a bit more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a quite smaller display, a lot lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little lower screen density. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 47% more battery size. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save some money and get the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.