Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Asus |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Aurora black | Space Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate's 83.2 score. The LG V50 ThinQ design is thinner and noticeably lighter than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has Android 12.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a bit better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2448 and a much lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display. LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior processor than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features a very superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.