Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Asus |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s general score of 77.8. The LG V50 ThinQ body is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), although both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has Android 11.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a processing unit that is just as good as the LG V50 ThinQ one, both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better display than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), and although they both have a same size display, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher display density.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better storage to install games and applications than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with superior battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.