Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Google Pixel, getting an 83.7 score against 80.2. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is a lot newer and just a little thinner, but notably heavier than the Google Pixel. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a larger screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a just a little higher pixels density.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality pictures, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lesser MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture to capture better low light images.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.