Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, LG V50 ThinQ's body is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 3. LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a larger display and a bit higher display density. LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37 percent bigger battery capacity. LG V50 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.