Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ design is a little bit lighter but a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 3 XL, and they were only released with a couple of months difference. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, a lower (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it is more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.