Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a, with a general score of 83.7 against 78.8. LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Google Pixel 3a, it must be noted that it's also a a little bit thicker and heavier device. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a bit higher display density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a quite larger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ costs more than Google Pixel 3a, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.