Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Pixel 4, having an 83.7 score against 81.9. LG V50 ThinQ is a better device than Google Pixel 4, we must note that it's also somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 and LG V50 ThinQ feature similar processors, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a quite larger display, a just a bit higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower video resolution, a camera with less MP resolution and a smaller back camera sensor, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.