Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 global score. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than Google Pixel 4 XL, and both were released only 6 months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL's CPU is very similar to LG V50 ThinQ's CPU, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ and the Google Pixel 4 XL both feature really similar displays, although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a just a bit inferior pixel quantity in each inch of display and a little bit smaller display. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back, a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.