Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a, getting a overall score of 83.7 against 82.9. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version. Even being the best phone we compare here, the LG V50 ThinQ is an older, way heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Google Pixel 4a.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a worse image quality, a camera in the back with less mega-pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% larger battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.