Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a bit thinner and lighter than LG V50 ThinQ. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a quite bigger display and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 5, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in LG V50 ThinQ, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 5 has a little better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 2% bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V50 ThinQ, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.