Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is slightly better than HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. LG V50 ThinQ's body is much newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a little bit higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have a same resolution back camera and the same video definition, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video and better video frame rates.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.