Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than HTC U11's global score of 77.6. LG V50 ThinQ is a newer phone than the HTC U11, although it is just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than HTC U11, because it has a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a larger display.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster processor than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ takes just a bit better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a 12 mega pixels back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater storage for applications and games than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.