Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the LG G5's general score of 76.1. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is notably newer than the LG G5's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than LG G5, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a larger display. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG G5, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than LG G5, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than LG G5, because although it has a lower video definition and a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a 0.38 inches sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than LG G5, because it has a 43% more battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.