Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, it must be told that it's also a somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker phone. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cores. LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a little better pixels count in each screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lot less mega pixels camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with improved battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.