Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than LG K52, having an 83.7 score against 76. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a bit lighter phone than LG K52, but they are 0.33inches thick. LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better screen density and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than LG K52, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory. The LG K52's battery life is very similar to the battery life in LG V50 ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.