Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the LG K62, having an 83.7 score against 78.2. The LG V50 ThinQ design has the same thickness than the LG K62, but it's just a bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and much more pixels per display inch.
The LG K62's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as LG V50 ThinQ's one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better performance than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG K62, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a way lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos.
LG K62 has a battery life that is very similar to LG V50 ThinQ's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.