Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aurora black | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's general score of 83.7. Both phones in this review have the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should give very similar OS features. LG K92's design has the same thickness than LG V50 ThinQ, but it's just a little bit heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than LG K92. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
LG K92 shoots better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ and the LG K92 both count with extremely similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 features a battery duration that's just as good as the LG V50 ThinQ one.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG K92, else you can save some dollars and get the LG V50 ThinQ, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.