Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than LG Stylo 6, getting an 83.7 score against 76.7. LG V50 ThinQ is an older cellphone than the LG Stylo 6, but LG made it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. These devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal memory. LG Stylo 6's battery life is very similar to the LG V50 ThinQ one.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs a bit more than the LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.