Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a score of 83.7 against 82.5. These phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V30S ThinQ.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a better count of pixels per inch in the screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a little bigger screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as the LG V50 ThinQ one, they have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.