Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a score of 83.7 against 81.3. LG V50 ThinQ's body is newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a processing unit that's just as good as the LG V50 ThinQ one, they have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a screen that is just as good as the display in LG V50 ThinQ, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a bit worse 1440 x 2880px resolution and a bit smaller screen, they both have a higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen. LG V50 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ has greater battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.