Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, having a general score of 87.6 against 83.7. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the LG V50 ThinQ, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices include Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features.
The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ and LG V50 ThinQ have very similar memory capacity for applications and games, both of them have an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a processor that is very similar to the processing unit in LG V50 ThinQ, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG V60 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor, a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a way higher video resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ has greater battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V50 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG V50 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.