Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, having a general score of 91.2 against 83.7. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should provide the user identical OS features. Even though LG Wing is newer than LG V50 ThinQ, it is way thicker and a lot heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than LG Wing, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixels count per screen inch.
LG Wing captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the LG Wing also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
LG Wing counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ and LG Wing feature very similar batteries duration.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.