Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, with an 89.6 score against 83.7. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide very similar OS features. The Motorola edge construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than LG V50 ThinQ.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola edge. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Motorola edge shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola edge also counts with a lot larger sensor and a lot more megapixels back facing camera. The Motorola edge counts with just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola edge has a little better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola edge, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.