Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora black | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 has a score of 86.1, which is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 has a more recent 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version. Motorola Edge 20's body is a lot newer, lighter and thinner than the LG V50 ThinQ.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little better performance than Motorola Edge 20, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V50 ThinQ and the Motorola Edge 20 both feature extremely similar batteries. Motorola Edge 20 takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.