Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting a 92.8 score against 83.7. Even though Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a little bit heavier than the LG V50 ThinQ, it's a little thinner and also much newer. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more recent 12 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, giving a couple additional features.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a very superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has just a little better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.