Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Edge (2024), with an 83.7 score against 78.5. LG V50 ThinQ's body is notably older, a little bit heavier and a little thicker than Motorola Edge (2024). Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge (2024) features just a bit better display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot less pixels per display inch and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
Motorola Edge (2024) and LG V50 ThinQ both count with very similar cameras, because although the Motorola Edge (2024) has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a much larger camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.