Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 overall score. LG V50 ThinQ is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, we must tell that it's also an extremely older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little inferior pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display. LG V50 ThinQ has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.