Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Aurora black | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's global score of 80.9. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but they are equally thin. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more processing cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a bit better display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a way lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has superior battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.