Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40's general score of 77.2. LG V50 ThinQ is an extremely older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge 40. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 40, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a bit sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 40 takes much better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and a lot larger sensor.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 features a little longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.