Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's global score of 77. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. Even being the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also a way older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier device.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.