Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with a general score of 83.7 against 83.4. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. LG V50 ThinQ is an extremely older device than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but LG could make it just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a display that is very similar to the screen in LG V50 ThinQ, because although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way worse amount of pixels in each inch in the screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.