Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with an 83.7 score against 81.9. The LG V50 ThinQ is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, we must note that it's also extremely older, a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a just a little lower screen pixels density, they both have a screen of the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a little longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.